Prior
to the end of its operations in March 31, 2006, The Coalition for International
Justice (CIJ) served as a global based non-profit organization, with offices in
Washington D.C. and The Hague. Accordingly,
CIJ assisted the international war crimes tribunals for Rwanda and the former
Yugoslavia (CIJ, 2006).
CIJ
was also instrumental in the transition of justice in East Timor, Sierra Leone,
Liberia, Cambodia, and The Sudan. In its
advocacy campaigns, CIJ conducted public education campaigns that targeted
mostly U.S. Decision makers in Washington, other capitals, international and
local media, and the public. Advocates of CIJ provided expert technical, legal,
and outreach assistance on cases before the International Court of Justice (See
Farah, 2004).
However,
in Liberia, CIJ carried out extensive investigation on the financial network of
ex-president Charles Taylor, going as far back as 1990. The reason for the investigation
was to determine the level of threat posed by Mr. Taylor’s financial network on
the peace and security of Liberia, the sub-region, and the world at large
(Farah, 2004, p. 20).
So,
the aim of this analysis is to further demonstrate, that despite his incarceration,
Mr. Taylor continues to exert his influence on Liberia through his financial
network, which is currently under the tutelage of Benoni Urey. Based on a Wikileaks’ revelation to the Daily
Telegraph of London, the speculated wealth of Mr. Taylor is about $400 million
(Hope, 2011).
Mr.
Taylor partly derived his financial resources from being warlord, as president,
and investment made since 2003 (Grant, 2007). Accordingly, before becoming
president in 1997, CIJ found that Mr. Taylor had access to an annual income of
over U$75 million. Subsequently, upon becoming president in 1997, that income
grew sharply to about $105 million annually till the end of his presidency in
August of 2003.
Consequently,
Mr. Taylor got the bulk of his personal wealth from spoliation of diamonds
(blood diamonds), timber, imposition of private taxes on gasoline and rice
importation, rubber, coffee, and rice production (CIJ, 2005). In view of this, Mr.
Taylor drew freely from the Liberian nation’s coffers or treasury, thereby putting
his annual income much higher. He is estimated to have made between 105-685
million dollars between 1992 and 2003 (CIJ 2005, p. 1).
But,
most of this wealth was spent on massive purchases of weapons, payments of
mercenaries or soldiers of fortune, proxy armies, estimated at about $70-80
million annually (CIJ 2005, p.11). However, the rest of Mr. Taylor’s financial
network remains under the control of Mr. Urey and seemingly banked in Burkina
Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, France, Italy, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, Panama,
and the Caribbean. U.S. Law Enforcement along with its European counterparts
suspected that Mr. Taylor operated at least some thirty companies to hide his
asset then (See Farah, n.d., para. 6).
According
to a U.N. Panel of Experts on Liberia Report to the Security Council dated
October 26, 2001, Mr. Taylor’s assets remain in ongoing investments in Liberia,
including Lone Star (Farah, 2004). Jacques Klein, a U.S. Justice official
testified in 2005, that “tracing what’s left of Mr. Taylor assets is tedious.” The
fact remains, that Mr. Taylor’s business transactions were or are clandestinely
held by other businesses with local and offshore corporations with entrant
shareholder. Taylor is also credited for using aliases and fake identities,
which prevents his name from appearing on all former transactions (See IRIN
New, 3 May 2005). In spite of that, investigators were able to linked Mr. Urey
as the primary manager of Mr. Taylor’s wealth through Lonestar Cell MTN (see
also CIJ, 2005, p. 12). Besides, Mr. Taylor’s illicit financial network mostly used
to facilitate his shadow commercial scheme, and now taken over by Urey, has far
reaching national and international implications for our fragile peace.
As
opposed to the legal parallel trade under Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf, a typical
President Urey’s economy will firstly foster the shadowy financial network of
Mr. Taylor. Duffield (2000, p. 84) argues that, shadowy networks such as Urey’s
inherited financial empire, may pretend to be local, while thinking globally.
Subsequently,
Reno (2000, p. 58) found that, Mr. Taylor’s empire that is now inherited by Mr.
Urey, largely focused on its global connections. For instance, Mr. Taylor used
companies throughout the world that pretended to invest in Liberia’s natural
resources and other sectors, but facilitated a number of smuggling operations,
such as “illicit contrabands, narcotics and weapons (CIJ, 2005, p. 3).”
Accordingly, Taylor also maintained a strong grip of the profits earned from
government backed subsidies.
More
so, Shelley (2005, p. 103) raised some important arguments about “shadow
commerce.” On the one hand, the analysis argues that, “the absence of agencies
that can enforce an autonomous notion of legality, generates opportunities for
politicians to use more innovative means to control natural resources and
translate them into political tools.” Secondly, under Mr. Taylor’s network in
Liberia, alliances were forged with terrorist entities owing to the lack of inefficient,
nonexistent or corrupt law enforcement agencies and governments. It can be
noted that, Mr. Urey’s business activities are manned by former forces of the
NPFL under the tutelage of Saah Gbolie.
Additionally,
if elected president, Mr. Urey will take over control of our Liberian borders, once
used as undetected smuggling routes by Mr. Taylor and his chain of
international rogue partners. In addition, Campbell (2000, 64) states that,
under Mr. Taylor, Liberia was not only used as a smuggling corridor, it provided
Liberian corporate profiles instantly with the need to list officers, owners,
shareholders, etc.
Campbell
(2000) further found, that these types of systems are rife to shadow rogue
entities seeking to shelter aircraft from inspection. So, once an airplane was
registered in Liberia, regardless where it is stationed globally, there is
hardly any evident of its travels” (Ibid.). Under Mr. Taylor, this proved
extremely useful for Viktor Bout who was the owner of many airlines and
aircrafts to easily register them and thwart regulators (p. 65).
Further,
Shelley (2005, p. 104) found that, international terrorist organizations like
ISIS and Al-Qaeda seek partnerships with rogue entities that are not only
motivated by spoils, but total access to criminal gangs that are open to fight
as mercenaries in foreign wars. In Liberia, the entire regime of Mr. Taylor was
the crime group whose primary focus was enhancing his shadow economy. And of
course, this criminal enterprise is all under the control of Mr. Urey (p. 105).
Others
may want to question the possibility that Mr. Taylor yields any influence over
Liberia at all with his incarceration in London. But, this won’t be the only
time Mr. Taylor has regulated power in Liberia from a distance. For instance,
an investigation by the Coalition of International Justice found in 2005 that,
Mr. Taylor directed monies from his asylum base in Calabar, Nigeria designed to
influence outcomes in Liberia (CIJ, 2005, p. 3-4). However, Mr. Taylor’s
sentence somehow obstructed his ability to influence situations in Liberia and
elsewhere.
Notwithstanding,
the investigation also found that, some of Mr. Taylor’s wealth was used to
sponsor at least nine of the parties that participated in the October 2005
presidential (see CIJ Report, 2005; The
New Republic, 2005/4/25). More frightening, these investigations found
strong evidence that Mr. Taylor’s influence has included the funding of violent
demonstrations in Monrovia in October 2004. For a full discussion of Mr.
Taylor’s influence over Liberia, please see Jacques Klein’s testimony to U.S.
House of Congress in 2005.
On
the hand, the CIJ (2005) report further named Emmanuel Shaw as another of
former Taylor’s associates, managing his financial network through PLC
Investment Limited. “Shaw also held investments at the Robertsfield
International airport, owning the hangers at Liberia’s only international
airport prior to 2005.”
Shaw
was the primary contact person for a series of illegal weapons shipments from
Serbia. Accordingly, it was he met the airplanes carrying weapons merchants who
illegally imported tons of weapons into Liberia, escorted the weapons dealers
and received gifts from them. He also leased two aircraft, both Boeing 727-200s
(registrations YU-AKD and YU-AKM) from the weapons merchants. These aircraft
were used to fly weapons from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso to Liberia from
November 2002 through February 2003.
As
the U.N investigating panel noted, “the range and capacity of these aircraft
are ideal for rapid shipment of light weapons and ammunition and these aircraft
could have dual use as revenue generator with passenger traffic and arms
transporter when necessary.” For a list of all former Taylor’s associates, see
CIJ (2005) endnotes.
On
the other hand, Mr. Taylor’s financial network included Mr. Urey’s role in the
siphoning of funds from the
Liberian International Shipping and Corporate Registry (LISCR), partly used to purchase weapons. Mr. Urey
also helped to manage the Taylor-controlled Lone Star Communications, served as primary liaison for the illegal
purchase of weapons from the Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout (see CIJ 2005, p. 23).
Accordingly, “Bout had two
important assets that set him apart from other traffickers: a private fleet of
about 50 aging Russian-made aircraft, acquired as the Soviet bloc crumbled, and
the ability to procure not only weapons, but advanced weapons systems
(anti-aircraft, anti-tank systems, attack helicopters), on short notice (p. 23).”
Consequently, one
of the primary reasons why Liberia was declared a rogue state was its key role in
the international arms trade, which facilitated Al Qaeda operatives, Israeli
mercenaries, Hezbollah diamond merchants, Russian and Balkan organized crime
figures and South African mercenaries. And since Mr. Taylor controlled the
borders, his security apparatus were able to guarantee that even wanted
criminals could enter and exit with impunity (Farah n.d., par. 5; Shelley 2005,
103). “Other connections Taylor developed included Leonid Minin, a
Ukrainian-Israeli citizen who specialized in surplus weapons stock from Kiev;
Aziz Nassour and Samih Osailly, Lebanese diamond merchants with connections
with former Israeli military officers and Russian merchants; Balkans’ weapons
trader, Slobodan Te_ic; and Iranian weapons dealer Ali Kleilat (CIJ 2005, 27)”
Although the UN has
dropped all sanctions on Liberia, and including the delisting of all Liberians
on travel ban and asset freeze, Mr. Urey remains on the U.S. Treasury
Department’s list of Specially Designated individuals with whom it is illegal
for citizens, residents aliens, and companies in the United States to conduct
business. One key question that looms on the minds of U.S. Justice Officials,
is the level of threat posed by pro-Taylor elements? According to a former
Chief Prosecutor of The Hague, Stephen Rapp, now serving as President Obama War
Crimes Czar, pro-Taylor forces
still have the ability to organize themselves. For instance, an NPP rally in
December 2008 and the recent launching of Ben Urey’s All Liberian Party has
both able attract sizable gathering (see Vol. 2, Telegraph, 2011/11/02).
Before her departure
from Liberia, Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield said this, “The peace in
Liberia remains fragile, and its only guarantee is the robust and adaptable
UNMIL presence. The GOL does not have the ability to quell violence, monitor
its borders or operate independently to fight crime. A government closer to Taylor
could tip the balance in the wrong direction.”
Reference
“Charles
Taylor’s Influence and Destabilization in West Africa: Guinea-January 2005” a
document marked “Extremely Sensitive,” prepared by the Special Court for Sierra
Leone, obtained by the authors. See also Mahtani, Dino, “Taylor accused over
attempt to kill Guinea leader,” Financial
Times, 27 April 2005.
2006. Liberia:
End of diamond and timber sanctions closer. Accessed September 12, 2015. http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/liberia/2006/0510sanctions.htm
Campbell, G.
(2002). Blood Diamonds: Tracing the deadly path of the world’s most precious
stones. Boulder: Westview Press.
Coalition for
International Justice (2005). Following Taylor’s money: A path of war and
destruction.
Coalition for
International Justice. (2006/3/31). Coalition for International
Justice accessed on September 13, 2015 from, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_for_International_Justice
Duffield, M.
(2000). Globalization, transborder trade, and war economies. In Greed and
grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars eds. Mats Berdal and David M. Malone,
69-90. Boulder and London: Lynne Reinner Publications.
Farah, D.
(2004). Blood from stones: The secret financial network of terror. New York:
Broadway Books.
Global Policy
Forum. N.d. Liberia. Accessed at: http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/liberindex.htm
Global Witness. (2007). Loopholes in the
Kimberley process: Illegal trade undermines efforts to combat conflict
diamonds. http://www.globalwitness.org/pages/en/the_kimberley_process.html
Grant, A. K.
(2007). Smuggling and trafficking in Africa. In Transnational threats:
Smuggling and trafficking in arms, drugs, and human life, ed. Kimberley L.
Thachuk: 113-130. London: Praeger Security International.
Hope, C.
(2011/11/02). Wikileaks: Charles Taylor may have $400 million out of reach.
Accessed on September 11, 2015. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wikileaks-files/8319158/WikiLeaks-Charles-Taylor-may-have-400-million-out-of-reach.html
How Charles
Taylor diverted $100m. September 11, 2015. http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/wanted/2003/0919money.htm
Hudson,
Alexandra. 2008. Taylor trial unique but sends key signal on impunity. May 18.
Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSL1228761320080518
“Jacques Klein
Discusses Liberia’s state of affairs and upcoming elections,” All things considered. National Public
Radio, 22 March 2005; “West Africa: Taylor will continue to destabilize region
until he’s tried for war crimes,” IRINNews, 3 May 2005; H. Con. Res. 127,
passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, 4 May 2005; passed by the U.S.
Senate, 10 May 2005.
Liberia, n.d:
The diamonds of terror. Enjenux Internationaux. Accessed on September 11, 2015 http://www.enjeuxinternationaux.org/articles/num11/en/liberia.htm
“Riots Kill 16,
Delay repatriation of refugees,” Africa
News, 1 November 2004; Paye-Lahley, Jonathon. “Liberia’s ex-warring
factions disband,” Associated Press,
4 November 2004.
“Taylor’s
meddling claims confirmed,” The Analyst (Monrovia), 2 May 2005; Lizza, Ryan,
“Charles at Large,” The New Republic,
25 April 2005.
Reno, W.
(1995). Reinvention of an African patrimonial state: Charles Taylor’s Liberia.
Third World Quarterly 16, n. 1: 109-120 (March).
Reno, W.
(1997). War, markets, and the reconfiguration of West Africa’s weak states. Comparative Politics 29(4), pp. 493-510.
Reno, W.
(2000). Clandestine economies, violence and states in Africa. Journal of International Affairs, 53 (2): 433-459.
Report of the
Panel of Experts on Liberia to Security Council, United Nations (Document
S/2001/1015), 26 October 2001, p. 93.
Report of the
Panel of Experts on Liberia to Security Council, United Nations (Document
S/2003/498), 24 April 2003, paragraphs 72-96.
Reynolds, P.
(2007). Charles Taylor – the trial begins. BBC News. June 4. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6707551.stm
Shelley, L.
(2005). The unholy trinity: Transnational crime, corruption, and terrorism. Brown Journal of International Affairs, 11
(2): 101-111.
The Telegraph.
(2011/11/02). Pro-Taylor forces still a force to be reckoned with. Accessed
from here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wikileaks-files/8319320/PRO-TAYLOR-ELEMENTS-STILL-A-FORCE-TO-BE-RECKONED-WITH.html
U.S. Dept. of
State. 2007. Background note Liberia. Accessed at: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/6618.htm
UN Travel Ban
List; U.S. Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control, List of Specially
Designated Liberian Nationals, 23 July 2004; UN Assets Freeze List.